Day 11 of the Prop 8 Trial: David Blankenhorn Doesn’t Know Either

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Share on Reddit0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someone

It’s hard to offer detailed summary of what was presented in court when so little substance actually came forth. I have to say, Boies is amazing at what he does. I can’t say as much for opposing counsel nor their “expert” witnesses.

This morning continued the cross-examination of Dr. Kenneth Miller. We learned that he does not know why psychiatrists, psychologists, university professors, or legal associations support same-sex marriage. He does know that religion led people to vote for Prop 8. We also learned that he has written at length about how voter initiatives enable discrimination against minorities, and that when minorities’ rights are restricted, their only recourse is the courts. He also admitted, as the LA Times repeated in their headline this afternoon, that prejudice helped pass Prop 8. Interesting!

Then we met Mr. David Blankenhorn, founder of the Institute for American Values. (Apparently, they do their own internal peer reviews. I don’t like how he throws the word “scholarly” around so much.) He’s not an expert in anything he was testifying about, and Judge Walker admitted as much, but still allowed him to testify. Given how the defense had trumpeted his “research,” the judge was probably just curious to see what this guy is made of. We learned that it’s not much.

After citing a lot of old studies and talking about the deinstitutionalization of marriage (whatever that means), Blankenhorn told us that none of those studies actually even referred to same-sex marriage. I think this quote sums up Blankenhorn’s “expertise”: “I did not know that every view I expressed had to be linked to a document I relied upon.” One thing he did tell us that seemed informed is that “same-sex marriage would be likely to improve the well-being of gay and lesbian households and their children.” Fancy that!

Truly, you should read the transcripts of Boies’ cross-exams. It’s riveting stuff. Rick Jacobs’ occasional editorial comments as he liveblogs on P8TT are quite enjoyable as well. There will be more in the morning, but then the proceedings will be over for a while until Judge Walker reconvenes for closing arguments.

By the way, if you’re curious to see how desperate the defense is getting, you should see how pathetic Andy Pugno’s post was after yesterday’s proceedings. Click here to see my analysis of it. I’m sure we’ll see more of that after today’s proceedings!

Here’s your roundup of the coverage! I’ll keep it updated throughout the evening!

ZFb: A Few Prop 8 Tidbits To Start Day 11

P8TT: Complete Transcript Summary, 0 for 2: Blankenhorn Looks Lost (Some great excerpts)

Firedoglake: Morning 1, Morning 2, Afternoon 1, Afternoon 2

Shannon Minter (NCLR): Day 11 Recap

San Jose Mercury: Prop. 8 trial Day 11: Live coverage from the courtroom, Prop 8 trial: Attorney, witness engage in bitter argument as testimony drawing to close

Los Angeles Times: Prejudice helped pass Prop. 8, professor testifies, Gay marriage could lead to fewer heterosexual marriages, witness says, The Prop.8 case trial memos

San Francisco Chronicle: Gays have political power, Prop. 8 defense says

Keen News Service: Mid-day report: Day 11 Prop 8 trial, Final Yes on 8 expert concedes ‘no scientific evidence’ of harm

Huffington Post (AP): Proposition 8 Trial: Defense Witness Says Gays Face Job Bias

New York Times: Same-Sex Marriage Case, Day 11: Churches

Wall Street Journal: Witness Assails Gay Marriages (They’ve got a sharp-looking interactive map, but it’s nothing new.)

Prop 8 on Trial: Defense witness, on direct, describes gay political power, Defense witness on cross: bans on same-sex marriage discriminate

LGBT POV: CA Congressmember John Garamendi on Prop 8 trial (An ally acting like an ally!!)

Queerty: Protect Marriage’s 1st Witness Admits DOMA is Discriminatory. Is Their Entire Case Doomed?

So, I cited Reuters yesterday, and I found another article today, but it mentioned nothing about any of the cross-examinations! It just said what the witness said under direct exam. So, I’m not going to cite Reuters anymore. If they’re going to ignore a significant portion of what takes place in the courtroom, they’re not worth linking to.

To round out the day, here are a few more Protect Mawwiage tweets. They didn’t say much today… maybe they thought the witnesses were hurting their own case enough as it is. I do like that they mentioned the guy who caused a small disruption this morning.

#prop8 witness: religions never ever do anything mean to minorities. Not once in human history. Don’t look it up, just trust us! @ADFMedia

@ADFMedia where did you hire the Bible thumper that burst into the #prop8 court screaming FAGGOTS? I liked his fanny pack. #protectmarriage

!HOMOAGENDA ALERT! Gays sending cyborg Gov Schwarzenegger back in time to kill Mary & Baby Jesus! #prop8 #protectmarriage

I noticed today that on ADF’s page full of info on the trial, they’re now linking to the official transcripts! I’m impressed! I hope they’re readers take a look and start to see through all the spin!

As always, the transcripts and all my past coverage can be found on the Perry v. Schwarzenegger archive!

Share on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Share on Reddit0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someone
Back to Top | Scroll down for Comments!

There are 3 Comments to "Day 11 of the Prop 8 Trial: David Blankenhorn Doesn’t Know Either"

Cancel Reply

Write a Comment